The future of marketing…

I just walked past a clothing store and got a text message from the store’s auto-responder. By passing by the store I had crossed through the company’s geo-fence – so what I received in the text was an image of myself wearing an attractive outfit comprised of pieces sold by the store, and the background was the restaurant where I had just had lunch a few minutes before.
The bottom of the screen said, “20% off entire outfit. Press ‘reply’ and a specialist will be right with you.” This isn’t the first time this has happened, but it’s the first time this clothing chain has made use of geo-related technology for marketing.

I won’t go into whether I bought the outfit, because that’s not the point. On the car ride home I used a radio app on my phone to stream some music. Every single song during my commute home was one I wanted to hear, and I realized after the fact that I had paid attention to the ads during the “limited commercial interruption.” I remember most of what was advertised, to the point that looked up one of the companies mentioned when I got home.

I enjoy having help at a clothing store. I appreciate that my tastes are acknowledged by radio programs and advertisers, and I like knowing that when it’s time to relax later, an almost-perfect t.v. lineup will be waiting for me.

In my world, the stuff we saw in Minority Report is almost feasible. There aren’t any eye scanners, and no names are being carved into wooden balls or anything, but as long as I have my phone,  the world seems to be perfectly tailored to me.

Because of the cross-integration (some might call it cross-contamination) of my personal data shared on social networks and my use of preference-sensitive programs, it’s not surprising that my favorite clothing store knows my face and my style. It’s due to a gradual sharing of information over the past few years. First Facebook tracked my likes and my social motives, then my phone started telling businesses when I was inside or nearby – I took the first step by forcing them to acknowledge me on Foursquare before they knew to look for me. There’s a bond of information between myself, the devices I use, and the places I go that makes all of this possible.

I helped create this scenario with a small trickle of information provided over the last few years. Once in awhile, I’d give a virtual “thumbs up” to a song I liked, I’d “check in” to a location, I’d “like”  different things online, and each interaction was logged by these different companies until it could be used to benefit both of us. My personal preferences, nuances of my identity, are in the hands of people I’ve never met.

Why am I not scared by this?

Because I wanted to share this information. None of it is too extremely personal. I’d tell my friend what style jeans I’m wearing, so why not tell a store so I can get a deal on them? My experience of a consumer’s world is tailored to my personal preferences, with the door wedged open just enough that I’m occasionally introduced to something new, which is nice.

Advertising is honed to perfection and works in harmony with data from large social networks, and conceptually speaking, this scenario – this lifestyle – is just a few years away at most. This means a lot of personal information has been aggregated, which scares some people. On the other hand, it means the potential end of conditioning ourselves to ignore the vast amounts of information being thrown at us on a daily basis.

My question to you is: does this version of the future have you nervous, or excited?

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

Marjorie Clayman October 26, 2010 at 11:13 pm

It scares the heck out of me, but then I’m a very paranoid individual. However, you write about it so well that I have to admit, I was kind of thinking, “Yeah…that is *kind of* cool I guess :)

Great and informative post, my friend :)

Reply

Tommy is my name October 26, 2010 at 11:31 pm

I think the main thing to remember is what is worth sharing and what isn’t.

Glad you liked it!

Reply

Brenda October 26, 2010 at 11:15 pm

A little bit of both, I think. Born in 1958, when TVs were black and white and telephones were attached to the wall and had rotary dials, sometimes when I find myself pulling out my Droid and going online to get information in the blink of an eye, I think, “This is just so cool.” Something that used to take me hours and require a visit to the library now takes seconds. My telephone books go unused. I enjoy music, tv, and rss feeds tailored to my particular likes and interests. I can download books to my Kindle and be reading them in no time flat. I have a laptop computer that is far and away superior to the mainframe we had at OSU in the 1970s. My grown-up sons are never more than a text message away. I have Facebook friends from around the world. This is just so cool.
Many people of my generation don’t like, trust, or use most of this technology. They worry about identity theft and such. Like you, Tommy, I don’t care who knows my address, which is, after all, in the good old telephone book, or that I like jeans from J. Jill, or that I read mystery stories. Send me those special offers for food and wine and let me know when my favorite fishing guides have openings. It’s just so cool.

Reply

Tommy is my name October 26, 2010 at 11:49 pm

It’s amazing to think of the progression from then to now. Back then, media marketing still hadn’t evolved much from it’s inception.

Now I think traditional media media marketing has evolved to the point where a paradigm shift is immanent. All of the technologies that were mentioned in this post are already available, it’s just a matter of getting them to work together.

Reply

Nate October 27, 2010 at 5:04 am

I agree that the use of the myriad of technologies is exciting. Being able to integrate your everyday with active consumerism can be efficient. I do worry about information sharing. along as the infoation is limited to what you provide and what is readily available I see no immediate concerns, I fear however that the information that business seek will soon over reach what we would casualy offer. Also, the future you are living is not cheap. How much does all of this intergrated technology cost. Side note; in my opinion the experience you speak of at the store is not marketing in the sence of advertising it is much more akin to cold sales.

Reply

Tommy is my name October 27, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Woah! Good to see you here Nate! :-D Seriously just made my day.

You have a good point about businesses over reaching on the information. I can only imagine at some point once we’re conditioned to giving away so much information someone will run a “Tell us your deepest secret” campaign (what’s worse is that people will do it.)

All of the technology is already in place, in the early scenario of showing me an image of me wearing clothes I do not own, is simply a matter of a photoshop action script, access to my Facebook images, and my telephone number. Technically this could be done now with an app, it would just require the know how to mash up a few different technologies. Then it would be up to the developer as to how much to charge, but I imagine it could get pretty pricy.

For some reason I couldn’t work in that using the geo-fence technology was opt-in which makes it less like cold sales. Yes if every company I walked past were to do that, well I’d just get pissed. The only places that could do it would be the ones that I allowed.

If you want to see how one company is using Fences check out

Reply

UrbanGorilla One October 27, 2010 at 9:54 am

Its a marketeers dream, but its also a little scary. But when you think of it, its absolutely the same whenever you use that payback card to benefit from minor scraps thrown your way.

The problem will be the forced opt-in to this scenario. It must be very clear, so everyone must be able to choose for himself and not just thrown into it without knowing.

I personally could care less if they use those minor details to tailor the ads for me. I like to discover new things and hate all the crap I am confronted with on a constant basis, so my vote is clearly in favour! It would be very deligthful to only get some “nice” interruptions, but hey.. when everything you are presented is stuff that you like, you will soon be stripped of your last shirt as well, so you need to beware as well!

Reply

Tommy is my name October 27, 2010 at 1:32 pm

Yes the key to this is that the opt in is truly opt in! That’s the fine line of cool to creepy

Reply

Suzanne Vara November 4, 2010 at 6:41 pm

Tommy

It may scare some of us that are older but the younger generation is growing up on Faceook, iphone, ipads, etc. They are the ones that will be wanting, creating and pushing this type of advertising and marketing. This is not so different than those of us who remember cable and the fears of the advertising on so many channels and it being “too much.”

I am not so scared by nor am I excited by it. I am a bit intrigued as we have this technology at our fingertips however with the breach in information releases is concerning. although when we think about it we readily and easily hand over our credit card numbers with purchases and security is breached there too. We will not have too much say in this as it will happen and those that wish to opt out or not take part, will not have the iphones or the check ins.

Great article on seeing into the future.

@SuzanneVara

Reply

Anonymous March 1, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Carmen October 21, 2011 at 3:49 pm

Love your blogs Tommy – you always have such an interesting perspective.

Reply

Tommy October 24, 2011 at 1:02 pm

Thanks Carmen!

Maybe some day in the near future you and I can chat about marketing perspectives and whatnot :-)

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 5 trackbacks }

« »
  • Tommy Walker

    Hi I'm Tommy

    If your customer’s aren’t absolutely enthusiastic about what you do, chances are you’re boring them to death. Currently, I'm teaching freelancers and entrepreneurs how to sell in higher paying markets

    Learn more